Controversy has erupted at the 2024 Paris Olympics following the participation of male boxers, previously disqualified for failing gender tests, in competitions against female opponents. This development has sparked significant debate over fairness and safety in women’s boxing, raising critical questions about gender testing policies and their implications.

The issue gained prominence when male athletes with XY chromosomes, who had previously been disqualified, were allowed to compete against female opponents. This decision has had profound implications for the integrity of women’s sports and has generated widespread criticism from various stakeholders. Critics argue that the current regulations are insufficient to ensure fairness and protect female athletes.

The International Olympic Committee’s defense of these competitors has further fueled the debate, casting doubt on the effectiveness of their gender policies. The International Boxing Association’s role in these controversies is also under scrutiny, as their previous decisions to disqualify certain athletes set a precedent that is now being questioned.

Olympics women's boxing: Italian abandons fight with Imane Khelif, who failed gender test

The controversy surrounding female boxers facing competitors with XY chromosomes highlights broader issues in gender identity and sports regulations. The inclusion of athletes who failed gender tests in female competitions has raised ethical concerns about the fairness and safety of these matches. As the situation continues to unfold, it could potentially reshape Olympic boxing and create new challenges in defining eligibility for female athletes.

Public reaction to these events reflects a growing demand for clearer regulations and guidelines concerning gender identity in sports. The backlash is expected to intensify as more people call for a reassessment of the rules governing gender and competition in the Olympic Games.