Royal biographer Tom Bower claimed the Duchess of Sussex is ruthless once she decides someone “should be neutralised and destroyed”.

The commentator, who is famous for his criticism of the Sussexes, sat down with Sun Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson on the Royal Exclusive Show.

He made some sharp remarks about his opinion on Meghan’s fractured family relationships.

“Meghan is an agent of poison, she’s able to destroy relationships and when she cultivates them it’s always for her own good, her own purpose,” Mr Bower claimed.

“She’s not actually someone who’s got any generosity of spirit and it is really one of the great sadnesses of this saga, that Meghan has destroyed the relationship between Harry and his family, just as she has destroyed the relationship, with not only her father but also her half-sister.”

Meghan’s dad Thomas has been estranged from his daughter since suffering two heart attacks on the eve of her wedding to Harry.

The 80-year-old was unable to walk her down the aisle, and they’ve not been in contact since.

Further turmoil between the pair erupted after Thomas posed for paparazzi pictures ahead of Harry and Meghan tying the knot.

He has since admitted they were a mistake and done his best to sincerely apologise.

Recent discussions surrounding Meghan Markle have intensified criticisms of her behavior within and towards the royal family, portraying her as an “agent of poison” with a relentless pursuit to neutralize those who oppose her. This characterization, echoed by commentators like Tom Bower, emphasizes Markle’s alleged willingness to sever ties and exploit relationships for personal gain.

Central to the discourse is Markle’s strained relationship with her father, Thomas Markle, which has been fraught with public disputes and personal grievances. Bower’s portrayal sympathizes with Thomas Markle, highlighting Markle’s purported mistreatment and abandonment of her father during crucial life moments. The narrative unfolds with accusations of Markle’s tendency to “ghost” individuals once their utility diminishes, a pattern reportedly extending to her own family members.

Beyond personal disputes, Markle’s public allegations of racism within the royal family have reverberated globally, tarnishing the monarchy’s reputation. Critics argue that these claims, unsubstantiated in some quarters, have significantly damaged public perception of the institution, eliciting mixed reactions both domestically and internationally.

The royal family’s response to these allegations has drawn its own share of scrutiny, criticized for what some perceive as a tepid defense against Markle’s assertions. This perceived lack of a robust counter-narrative has fueled ongoing debates about the monarchy’s ability to effectively manage public relations crises.

Meanwhile, the actions of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle continue to provoke controversy and public division, contributing to a decline in their popularity and trustworthiness. Their decisions, from international tours to commercial ventures, have exacerbated tensions within the royal family and raised questions about their long-term impact on its reputation.

Moreover, Markle’s ventures in the public sphere, leveraging her royal connections for personal gain despite facing public disapproval, have further strained relations between the Sussexes and the British public. This pursuit of fame and financial independence has underscored their departure from traditional royal obligations, positioning them as figures of controversy rather than unity.

As the saga unfolds, observers speculate on the future trajectory of Harry and Meghan’s influence within the royal family and beyond. Their choices, coupled with ongoing public scrutiny, may redefine their legacy and the monarchy’s enduring relevance in a rapidly changing world.

In conclusion, the narrative surrounding Meghan Markle and her interactions with the royal family reflects broader debates on tradition, celebrity, and the responsibilities of public figures. As the monarchy navigates these challenges, the repercussions of Markle’s actions continue to shape public discourse and perceptions of royalty in the modern era.