Jessica Mulroney she’s Meghan’s former BFF, a Canadian fashion stylist, and apparently the keeper of all Meghan’s dirty secrets. And boy, has she decided to spill the beans.

According to Mulroney, she and Meghan were running a scheme that would make the characters from “Hustle” look like amateurs. We’re talking about exploiting royal connections to score freebies, billing King Charles for bogus expenses, and then selling off the swag for cold, hard cash. It’s like “Ocean’s Eleven” meets “The Crown,” and I am here for it.

Now, let’s break this down, shall we? First, we have the freebie fiasco. Apparently, Meghan and Jessica were using the royal name to get their hands on luxury goods faster than you can say “God Save the Queen.” We’re talking designer clothes, fancy skincare, probably even gold-plated teapots for all we know. They were treating these high-end brands like their personal Costco, and the currency was royal clout.

But here’s where it gets juicy. They weren’t just hoarding these freebies like some kind of post-dragon’s treasure. No, that would be too simple for our dynamic duo. Instead, they were allegedly turning around and selling these items for profit. That’s right, folks—the Duchess of Sussex, fifth in line to the throne, was essentially running a royal yard sale. Can you imagine? Gently used tiara, only worn once to disappoint the queen. Asking price: your firstborn child and a small kingdom.

But wait, there’s more. As if scamming luxury goods wasn’t enough, they were apparently double-dipping by billing good old King Charles for various expenses. It’s like she took one look at the royal coffers and thought, “You know what this needs? A touch of Hollywood accounting.”

Now, I can already hear some of you out there defending Meghan. You’re saying, “Maybe she was trying to save the taxpayers some money. Maybe she was redistributing wealth.” To which I say, if that’s wealth distribution, then I’m the king of England. No, what we’re looking at here, if these allegations are true, is a level of grift that would make the most seasoned con artists tip their hat in absolute respect.

Let’s not forget, this is coming from Jessica Mulroney—the same Jessica who was once Meghan’s ride-or-die, her Canadian concierge, the woman who was there for all the big moments. So why is she spilling the tea now? Is this a case of revenge served ice-cold, or is Jessica trying to get ahead of a story that was bound to come out anyway?

I can jst imagine the conversation:

Harry: “Darling, that’s a lovely new handbag. Is it new?”

Meghan: “Oh, this old thing? I’ve had it for ages. Now, can you sign the expense report for your dad? It’s for royal stuff.”

Jokes aside, if there’s any truth to these allegations, it could have serious consequences. We’re not just talking about a slap on the wrist or a strongly worded letter. This is the kind of scandal that could lead to investigations and legal action. It’s like finding out your favorite influencer’s authentic posts are all paid promotions.

Hot news

48,000 SIGNATURES SO FAR Calls mount to strip Prince Harry of award honouring military legend Pat Tillman, positioning the Sussexes two of the ‘most unpopular figures in the US’

The Sussexes Face Backlash After ESPN Honors Prince Harry

In a recent turn of events, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, Prince Harry and Meghan Markle, have found themselves at the center of controversy in the United States. ESPN’s decision to award Prince Harry the prestigious Pat Tillman Award has sparked outrage, particularly from the mother of the late US war hero, Pat Tillman.

The Background

Pat Tillman, an NFL star, tragically lost his life in action after joining the US military following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. His legacy is honored through the Pat Tillman Award, which recognizes individuals with a strong connection to sports and a commitment to serving others.

Mary Tillman’s Critique

Mary Tillman, Pat Tillman’s mother, expressed her disapproval of ESPN’s choice to honor Prince Harry. She believes that the award should have gone to someone who truly embodies the spirit of sacrifice and duty. Her sentiments are echoed by many Americans who feel that Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s actions do not align with the values they hold dear.

Unpopularity in the US

Royal commentator Nile Gardiner weighed in on the situation, labeling Prince Harry and Meghan Markle as “two of the most unpopular figures in the US today.” Their perceived narcissism and divisive behavior have not endeared them to the American public, especially those who hold the Royal Family in high regard.

Speaking to GB News on Tuesday, royal commentator Nile Gardiner said the renegade prince and his wife Meghan Markle are “two of the most unpopular figures in the US today”.

“Harry and Meghan’s narcissism does not go down very well in the United States and America,” he said.

“Most American people really love the Royal Family, okay. They do not look kindly upon Harry and Meghan trashing them in the United States and does not go down very well.

“They’re very divisive figures, and this award is very, very controversial. There’s a huge backlash in the United States, and it’s an illustration of just how unpopular Harry and Meghan are on both sides of the Atlantic.”

The Backlash

An online petition urging ESPN to reconsider its decision has garnered over 48,000 signatures. Commenters on the petition expressed outrage, drawing a sharp contrast between Pat Tillman’s selfless sacrifice for duty and country and Prince Harry’s departure from royal responsibilities. Some even accused Prince Harry of prioritizing a “Hollywood dream” over his duty.

Many Americans quickly took to the comments section of the petition to voice their outrage, with one person contrasting the differences between Mr Tillman and the Duke’s Army service.

“Pat Tillman sacrificed his life for duty and country! Harry walked away from duty and country & spit on his commander in chief, country, duty & family on his way out,” they said.

“All for a Hollywood dream! I’m appalled as an American that you would give him this award. It now means nothing!

“I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award,” she said.

ESPN’s Defense

ESPN, however, stands by its decision. The network cites Prince Harry’s work with the Invictus Games Foundation, an organization that promotes healing through sports for military service members and veterans worldwide. Despite the controversy, ESPN believes that honoring Prince Harry’s contributions to this cause is worthwhile.

The Invictus Games

Prince Harry’s involvement in launching the Invictus Games has been widely praised. These multi-sport, Paralympic-style games provide a platform for wounded or injured servicemen and veterans to compete and inspire others. For Prince Harry, receiving the Pat Tillman Award is a testament to the entire service community.

In conclusion, while opinions remain divided, ESPN’s decision to honor Prince Harry underscores the complexity of balancing fame, duty, and service. Whether one agrees or disagrees, the Pat Tillman Award continues to evoke passionate responses on both sides of the Atlantic.

Hot news

Prince Harry faces BARRAGE OF BRUTIAL CRITICISM in the US with Pat Tillman Award, with royal fans fervently advocating for the return of Invictus Games to its ‘true’ founders Prince William and Princess Catherine

Prince Harry, the Duke of Sussex, has found himself at the center of a heated debate in the United States after being nominated for the prestigious Pat Tillman Award for Service at the ESPY Awards. While some applaud the recognition, others question whether he truly embodies the spirit of the award.

The Pat Tillman Award: A Legacy of Selflessness

The Pat Tillman Award is named in honor of Pat Tillman, a former NFL player and US Army Ranger who made the ultimate sacrifice in Afghanistan. Tillman abandoned a lucrative football career to serve his country, and his legacy is one of selflessness and unwavering commitment.

Tillman’s mother’s disapproval

Mary Tillman, the mother of Pat Tillman, expressed her shock and disappointment at ESPN’s choice. She was never consulted about the decision to give the award to Prince Harry. In an interview with the Daily Mail, she stated, “I am shocked as to why they would select such a controversial and divisive individual to receive the award.” Mary Tillman believes there are more deserving recipients within the veteran community who lack the privilege and resources that Prince Harry possesses.

Pat McAfee’s Critique

Sports analyst and former NFL punter Pat McAfee minced no words when expressing his opinion about Prince Harry’s nomination. He criticized the ESPY Awards for their decision, arguing that it does not align with the award’s intended purpose. According to McAfee, the award should go to someone with a strong connection to sports who has served others in a manner reflective of Pat Tillman’s legacy.

Departure from Royal Duties

McAfee also pointed out that Prince Harry’s departure from royal duties raises questions about his eligibility for the award. “It’s going to Prince Harry,” McAfee quipped, “who I don’t even think is a prince anymore.” The departure from his royal role has left some wondering whether Harry’s current path truly reflects the selflessness associated with the award.

Lack of Due Diligence?

The controversy extends to the ESPY Awards’ selection process. Winners are chosen through global online fan voting from candidates selected by the ESPY Select Nominating Committee. McAfee criticized this process, suggesting that it lacked due diligence. He questioned whether the committee thoroughly researched its candidates before making the nominations.

Fan Reactions

McAfee summed up the sentiment among sports fans succinctly: “Hey, don’t be putting our f***ing guy with that guy.” The immediate reaction from many is one of skepticism, wondering if Prince Harry truly belongs in the same category as Pat Tillman.

Some even require the Invictus Games to be returned to Prince William and Princess Catherine, who they believe to be its ‘true’ founders.

In the end, the debate continues, and the ESPY Awards’ decision to nominate Prince Harry remains a topic of intense discussion. Whether he deserves the Pat Tillman Award or not, the controversy underscores the importance of honoring those who embody selflessness and service in the world of sports.

Hot news

A whole new shocker as a person claiming to be Meghan Markle’s 21-year-old secret daughter releases a trove of evidence of her cruelty, revealing shocking details

In a dramatic turn of events that has sent shockwaves through the British Monarchy and beyond, a young woman claiming to be Meghan Markle’s secret daughter has come forward with explosive testimony in an ongoing lawsuit. The 21-year-old, identified only as Sarah in court documents to protect her privacy, alleges years of neglect and emotional abuse at the hands of the Duchess of Sussex.

Details surrounding the alleged relationship, as guessed Sarah’s lawsuit centers around a financial settlement she claims was promised by Meghan Markle before the latter entered the royal family. The nature of this promise and the events leading up to it are yet to be revealed in court. However, the bombshell revelation of a secret daughter has overshadowed the legal proceedings, leaving the world to grapple with the legitimacy of Sarah’s claims and the potential fallout for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex.

Social media has erupted in a frenzy of speculation and accusations. Meghan Markle, once adored for her relatable charm and modern approach to royal life, now faces an onslaught of criticism. Die-hard royalists express outrage at the alleged betrayal, while others question the timing of the lawsuit, coinciding with a period of dwindling popularity for the Sussexes within the royal family.

The accusations are sure to cause significant rifts. Prince Harry, long known for his rebellious streak, may find himself further ostracized, especially if Sarah’s claims hold any truth. The Queen, a symbol of stability and tradition, will undoubtedly be deeply affected by this public scandal.

The British press, never one to shy away from sensational headlines, is having a field day. Articles dissect Meghan Markle’s past relationships, searching for any crumb of evidence that might corroborate Sarah’s story. Pundits and commentators weigh in with their opinions, further fueling the media firestorm.

The lawsuit itself promises to be a spectacle, with the potential to expose private details about Meghan Markle’s life before she became royalty. If Sarah’s claims are proven true, it would represent a monumental betrayal of trust within the royal family. The consequences for Meghan and Harry’s relationship with the monarchy and with the public could be irreparable.

However, amidst the whirlwind of accusations and speculation, a crucial question remains unanswered: Is Sarah’s story genuine? There is a chance, however slim, that this could be an elaborate hoax, an attempt to secure a financial windfall from the Duchess. Only time and the ongoing legal proceedings will reveal the truth.

Until then, the shadow of this alleged secret daughter hangs heavily over the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, threatening to shatter their carefully constructed image and plunge the British Monarchy into a new era of uncertainty.