Colombia’s president recently rejected Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s request for special security during their upcoming visit, citing the country’s limited resources and the need to prioritize the safety of local citizens. This decision has ignited a debate over royal privilege, highlighting shifting attitudes towards international diplomacy and the treatment of foreign dignitaries.

The president’s refusal marks a notable departure from the traditional accommodations extended to British royals by host countries. Historically, royal visits have been accompanied by extensive security and ceremonial measures, reflecting a longstanding practice of honoring the privileged status of royalty’.

However, Colombia’s stance underscores a growing sentiment against such privilege, with the focus now squarely on national interests rather than accommodating foreign requests.

Public reaction to this decision has been polarized. Some supporters of the president argue that the refusal represents a fair and equitable use of resources, emphasizing a commitment to local needs over the special treatment of royals.

Conversely, critics view the denial as a diplomatic slight, potentially straining relations between Colombia and the British monarchy. This controversy illustrates the complexities of modern diplomacy and the evolving perceptions of royal entitlement.

Prince Harry, Meghan Markle have 'shot themselves in the foot by being so  controversial'

The Colombian government’s decision reflects a broader trend of nations reassessing their approach to royal visits and diplomatic interactions. Similar instances of resistance to royal demands have occurred in other countries, such as India and Canada, indicating a pattern of pushback against perceived royal entitlement. As global attitudes shift, there is increasing pressure on royalty to adapt and engage in more nuanced diplomacy, rather than relying solely on their historic status.

This incident signals a potential transformation in how countries interact with royalty, suggesting a move towards prioritizing domestic concerns and reassessing traditional diplomatic norms. For the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, this evolving landscape may necessitate a recalibration of their approach to international engagements, emphasizing a need for genuine diplomatic efforts in a changing global context.