The Wife needs to make sure she has a permanent link to the Royals even after she tosses her husband to the curb, even though neither of the kids, should they actually exist, have been seen for months. Gavin-I mean, Archie for longer than “Lili”.

ROYAL BOMBSHELL: Lady C demands Archie and Lilibet are removed from the  line of succession, unless the Palace can provide “absolute proof that  Meghan bore those children"

“Archie” was a no-show to his own fourth birthday while his mother was out hiking with Markus Anderson and his father immediately took off yet again to go watch polo live as soon as he left the Coronation where a large red feather upstaged his attempts at getting material for Netflix seeing as his wife was NOT invited.

If these kids do exist, then I feel for them, having incredibly deluded, addicted, self absorbed parents like the Harkles. Not to mention either of them are not seen in public at all unless there’s an extremely filtered, heavily edited photoshopped “photo-op” where no one ever sees their actual faces and life can’t seem to decide whether Archie has red hair or dark. It changes every other photo.

Why the Royals Don't Wish Harry, Meghan and Their Kids Happy Birthday | Us  Weekly

I do really wonder how Archie has apparently gone backward in time from a 4-year-old to a 2-year-old though from that picture that was released about his supposed recent birthday(that has since disappeared) and how “Lili” never seems to age at all. Not to mention how The Wife seems to have dropped years herself plus lost some of that work she’s had done in “Lili’s” last birthday photo. That’s some secrets she’s hiding.

Theres also her own father stating she had a hysterectomy in her late 20s. If that’s true, then the kids could possibly be Mr Harkles but they would NOT be The Wife’s. Why the Royals would even play along with this is mind-boggling even if his Majesty keeps dropping remarks implying that he doesn’t even know where the kids even are.